Archive for the ‘Well Being’ Category

New Brain Cells, Stress, And Learned Behavior

Thursday, April 1st, 2010
Stressed Out Mouse

Stressed Out Mouse

A new study by UT Southwestern scientists (Lagace, Donovan, DeCarolis, Farnbauch, Malhotra, Berton, Nestler, Krishnan and Eisch) sheds some light on the connection between stress and neurogenesis.

Eisch and her colleagues performed two experiments related to stress.

1. They exposed mice to a socially stressful experience — confrontation with a more aggressive mouse (the mouse equivalent of a carjacking), then measured the immediate and long term impact on the generation of new brain cells.

2. They irradiated mice to eliminate neurogenesis before exposing the irradiated mice to the same kind of stressful situation.

The scientists made two important findings:

In the first experiment, the stressful situation reduced neurogenesis temporarily (for a few days), and left the mice more likely to be fearful in similar situations.

In the second experiment the irradiated mice showed less fear when exposed to similar stressful situations.

These findings indicate that neurogenesis is key to forming stress memories. This can be a healthy response, educating us on avoidance. (Common sense.) But in cases of inappropriate or chronic stress response, neurogenesis may be overactive.

http://www.pnas.org/content/107/9/4436.abstract

Long Term Brain Training Update

Monday, March 29th, 2010

Dave asked about recent progress since I’ve been doubling up my daily brain training quota with one session of regular dual n-back and one session of MindSparke’s “nines”:

Here is my dual n-back training progress chart starting in June 2008. I started the doubled up training regime around session 208.

Long Term Brain Training Progress

Long Term Brain Training Progress

The chart shows that since doubling up training sessions my n-back averages have been increasing quite sharply, more sharply than at any point since the initial training period. It also shows that daily n-back averages have been oscillating more dramatically than before, swerving between lows in the low 8s and highs in the low 11s. My recent high score of 11.3 far exceeds the 9.3 high I had posted before I started the doubled-up sessions.

In everyday life I’ve been relishing the benefits of the new training. All of the benefits I had noticed before have been heightened — quicker absorption of complex material, increased ability to frame and communicate information in written form, increased ability to solve problems.

I’ve also noticed that my everyday memory has improved. This was something I didn’t notice previously. But the difference is marked. I’ve always been absent minded, forgetting to do things, forgetting names, etc. but recently I’ve been surprising myself by being far less absent minded.

Other benefits have been an improved ability to write songs and play guitar. In writing songs I’ve noticed that I am better able to understand and communicate the ideas and emotion behind the inspiration for the song.

(Oh, and crossword solving ability has improved, too…)

New Understanding of Neurogenesis

Friday, March 26th, 2010
Neurogenesis

Neurogenesis

Not all new brain cells end up getting used. Why do some survive and become useful when others don’t? That’s the question associate professor Angelique Bordey and her team from Yale University have shed some light on with a recent study, as reported in the March 25 issue of Neuron.

Bordey’s team looked at adult neurogenesis. They found that if certain receptors (NMDA receptors) associated with the new neurons are lost, the cells are much more likely to die. (NMDA receptors are key to the transmission of information in the brain and malfunctioning of these receptors has been associated with various mental disorders and diseases.)

The study has implications for stem cell transplantation and brain health education: Bordey noted that stem cells used in transplants may need to be mature enough to possess these receptors. And the general public should be aware that drugs (e.g., PCP, or angel dust,) that prevent NMDA function, kill brain cells and adversely affect brain development.

Neurofeedback And Brain Plasticity

Wednesday, March 17th, 2010
neurofeedback-tms

Neurofeedback TMS

Natural neurofeedback has been practiced for many years. By providing the subject with immediate feedback on the electrical activity in the brain, he or she can learn to modulate this activity. Up until now the direct impact of this process on brain mechanics has been little understood.

In a groundbreaking study, scientists from the University of London have gleaned the first evidence of neuroplastic changes associated with neurofeedback training. Thirty minutes of mindful control of brain waves can induce a persistent change in brain activity and response.

Tomas Ros and co-authors Diane Ruge and Moniek Munneke, under the supervision of Professors John Gruzelier and John Rothwell, showed that activating neurofeedback (suppressing alpha brainwaves) increased cortical responsiveness and significantly improved synaptic communication. These effects were observed for more than 20 minutes, a time-span consistent with neuroplastic change.

These findings call for a reexamination of prior studies of neurofeedback training, and hold out promise for natural brain training therapies.

The Neurology of Compulsion And Treatment

Tuesday, February 2nd, 2010

Dr. Jack Wang has been doing some interesting work studying what’s going on in the brains of those who have compulsive cravings. He shows that a pattern of behavior that triggers a disproportionate feeling of satisfaction or reward leads the brain to dampen the neurological effect of the habit, leading to a desire for more.

Dopamine surges make us want to repeat important human behaviors such as eating and having sex.

“Imagine what a strong hold these hijacked reward pathways take on our brains and our whole existence when they’re so closely connected, geographically and anatomically speaking, with our memories and our emotions,” says Petros Levounis, MD, director of the Addiction Institute of New York at St. Luke’s and Roosevelt Hospitals in Manhattan.

In an unhealthy habit, the dopamine surges become too much for the normal inhibitory control of the brain’s frontal lobes to damp down.

“Ultimately,” Levounis says, “the war on drugs is a war between the hijacked reward pathways that push the person to want to use, and the frontal lobes, which try to keep the beast at bay. That is the essence of addiction.”

Dr. Jack Wang, MD, of Brookhaven National Laboratory on New York’s Long Island, has conducted several brain imaging studies of obese patients using PET-CT scans.

In both drug-addicted and obese patients, brain scans show a lack of dopamine receptors, a result of the prior dopamine overload.

“If a person constantly has an excess of dopamine, the brain will down-regulate,” Wang says, “Once the system is down-regulated, we have to do more in order to get the same amount of feeling in our normal state.”

Wang and his colleagues have also shown that a higher body mass index (BMI) correlated with lower prefrontal cortex function — the area associated with inhibitory control.

“If they’re obese,” Wang said, “they have a problem controlling their eating behaviors.”

The idea of medications that act on the dopamine system is “to cool down those reward pathways,” Levounis says. There are two strategies for doing so: an agonist strategy, or an antagonist strategy.

The agonist strategy is “feeding the beast, providing activity in the cell so that the cravings go down,” Levounis said (such as nicotine patches, or methadone for opioid dependence.)

The antagonist strategy aims to block the receptors. Naltrexone, for example, blocks opioid receptors so that the drug addict won’t feel anything if he or she attempts to get high.

“After a while, you say, ‘This is not worth my time, my money, my trouble,’ so you stop using,” Levounis explains.

So far, these have been the two main strategies in addiction pharmacotherapy, but there’s now a “third avenue” — the partial agonist approach.

In the partial agonist approach, one molecule blocks most receptors while still providing helping to calm cravings.

This leaves the question of boosting inhibitory control.

Psychiatrists will try to “cool down” the reward pathways, often with medication. Then, they target the diminished frontal lobes with psychotherapy.

“We try to beef up the frontal lobes as much as we can, and we do that with psychotherapy,” Levounis said.

Researchers agree that psychotherapy is key to regaining self-control, and it’s the predominant treatment used in patients with addictive behaviors.

Mark Smaller, PhD, a psychoanalyst in private practice in Chicago, said psychotherapy often reveals an underlying cause for an addiction or compulsive behavior. Usually, it’s anxiety or depression.

Acknowledging those problems may help change behaviors. Once they’re realized, a patient can start working against them, with the help of the brain’s own neuroplasticity. Essentially, neurons can disconnect and reconnect, or loosen their connections and tighten them, which often manifests in noticeable change.

“[Psychological] insights can actually begin to change brain chemistry and diffuse compulsions,” he said. “If you address those issues, you can have a positive impact on your life that can change the chemistry of your brain.”

***I would add that some Mind Sparke customers have found that dual n-back training can help boost the frontal lobes and assist with compulsion control.***

See the article used as the source of this post in “MedPageToday

Neurogenesis And Depression – Further Research

Saturday, January 30th, 2010
Brain Cell

Brain Cell

A clinical study shows that promoting neurogenesis has a positive impact on the symptoms of major clinical depression.

As we’ve noted on this blog before, the process of brain training also seems to have a positive impact on mood. Evidence builds that the connection is the stimulation of new brain cell growth…

Read more about the study…

The Phrenology of Fear

Thursday, January 28th, 2010
Mortified Mouse

Mortified Mouse

Scientists at Emory University, extending the work of others scientists who have identified the amygdala (an almond-shaped brain region) as key to our fear response, have shown that the prelimbic cortex plays a role, too.

Kerry Ressler, MD, PhD, and his team found that without a critical growth factor in the prelimbic cortex mice become less prone to remember a previously frightening experience. This finding could benefit the diagnosis and treatment for anxiety disorders such as post-traumatic stress disorder and phobias.

BDNF (brain-derived neurotrophic factor) has been called Miracle-Gro for brain cells. The protein protects cells from stress and stimulates them to forge new connections. Previous studies had shown that blocking BDNF’s action in the amygdala made it more difficult for fear memories to take hold.

“The prelimbic cortex is part of the medial prefrontal cortex, which appears to be important for emotional regulation in rodents as well as humans,” Ressler says. “Evidence is building that these regions may be dysregulated or even over-active in fear and anxiety disorders in humans.”

“This work is important for extending our understanding of how BDNF is important for neuronal plasticity, learning and memory,” Ressler says. “Together with our previous work, these data suggest that preventing neural plasticity in very precise, but critical brain regions, can have vastly different effects on emotional memory.

“It is becoming increasingly clear that these prefrontal cortex regions are functionally associated with regions of the brain known for a long time to be involved in emotion, such as the amygdala and hippocampus,” he adds. “Understanding the molecular and cellular mechanisms of these connections in rodent models will provide scientists a better understanding of how these similar areas are functioning in humans.”

See the report in Science Codex

Training progress for mere mortals – session 303

Tuesday, January 26th, 2010

A few days ago i broke through the n = 6 barrier with a average n back score of 6.05.

The thing that still fascinates me about this is that I’m still seeing slow continuous improvement in my scores. It hasn’t been easy or rapid but steady and pretty continuous. I have felt and seen the difference that clearer thinking can make in day to day and professional life.

It’s really remarkable to reach a max average n back greater than 6… and now i can do 5’s almost without thinking… that just freaks me out.

I’ve been keeping track of my scores in a spreadsheet which enables me to look back on my progress several different ways: number of training days vs progress, number of training sessions vs progress and calendar time vs progress. I’ve completed 303 sessions along the way over the past 9 months.

The most positive and consistent correlate seems to be number of training days with n=back progress.  The graph correlating calendar days to training progress is fascinating in showing a long plateau around n=5 last summer.

Thanks to all who have posted in this blog for inspiration and motivation to keep going.

The key learning from this, for me, is that continuous if not rapid improvement in your working memory is possible whether you start out as a genius or not. Hard work can pay off just stick with it.  Benefits correlated with improvement in working memory are available to all of us.

Encouraging Appropriate Brain Cell Growth

Sunday, January 17th, 2010

In an interesting story about therapy for those with spinal cord injuries, I saw this nice quote on the importance of appropriate brain training. After explaining that most patients with significant spinal cord trauma suffer more or less permanent neurological deficits, Garrett Riggs, M.D., assistant professor of neurology at the University of Central Florida in Orlando, Fla., said:

“Nerve cells do grow, but the problem is getting them to grow from the right spot and make the right connections.”

Eloquently put. The same can be said for any brain training. It should be constructed so as to stimulate the production of new brain cells and encourage the brain to put these new nerve cells to use in a way that will benefit our cognition.

Here’s the full story.

Working-Memory Training Report – martin – Session 24 (nines)

Thursday, January 7th, 2010

Session number: 24 (nines)

Average n-back: 8.55

Duration (min.): 40

After a training break of about three weeks (due to moving and holiday travel), I was very pleased with today’s session.

Over the past few weeks I’ve been taking a blend of natural supplements to detoxify (extracting heavy metals that the body doesn’t easily eliminate) and improve brain function. I was immediately pleased with way these supplements made me feel (less foggy, more alert, less tired, and healthier).

I’m interested to see whether taking the supplements coincides with an unusual increase in training scores. I would theorize that eliminating long-present toxins might lead to a mid term climb in scores as my brain is freed from their insidious effect. This would be visible in the training record.

In any case, I’ve been very pleased with the supplements and I will be giving more information about them over time.

Session 24

Session 24

Brain Fitness Pro working-memory training report.

This post was submitted by martin.