Archive for the ‘Hints and Tips’ Category

Double Dose Brain Training 18 Days

Sunday, February 21st, 2010

After 18 days of double dose brain training (one session of regular dual n-back combined with one session of “nines”) I’m still amazed at the effect on my scores. Apart from a general dramatic increase in sustained focus (even managing to stay at  n=11 for four rounds yesterday) I’ve seen another intriguing trend. On days when I do particularly well at one exercise I often don’t do well at the other. This shows itself in the chart below as the two score lines for dual n-back and “nines” zig-zag about the combined average.

Brain Training - Double Dose 18 Days

Brain Training - Double Dose 18 Days

What’s more I can feel the change as I go from one exercise to the other. On some days my mind grasps and remembers the letters much better than it grasps and remembers the numbers, and vice versa. A very curious phenomenon. (It also doesn’t matter which exercise I work on first — I’ve been switching back and forth from one day to the next.)

Has this double dose training resulted in cognitive benefits? It feels as though it has. I feel more alert and “quicker.” (In November I took the Get Gamma test. Maybe I’ll retake at some point soon to see whether there has been a measurable change.)

Brain Training with “nines” – New High

Saturday, February 20th, 2010

Maintaining a training regime of double sessions (one regular dual n-back and one “nines”) is still proving highly effective. It’s tough to dedicate the amount of time required, but I would highly recommend this as a “booster” training approach. Averages have been up in the high 8s (much higher than when I was just doing one session per day), and today I scored a new high at “nines” of 9.65…

Brain Training With Nines - Session 48

Brain Training With Nines - Session 48

Targeted Brain Exercise Boost For Kids

Thursday, January 21st, 2010

Berkeley neuroscientist Dr. Silvia Bunge and her team devised two clever programs to determine whether carefully selected training exercises could boost IQ and processing speed. The experiment, which sounds akin to building a kit car out of hardware store purchases, involved underprivileged children with lower than average cognitive scores. The researchers involved them in 20 hours of after-school game and puzzle play. One group focused on reasoning exercises, the other on pure processing speed.

The results were a dramatic increase in IQ of 13 points for the reasoning group, and a similarly dramatic increase in processing speed for the processing speed group. (There was no cross-over — the training boosted the scores for the specific function being trained.)

See the full article.

Working-Memory Training Report – Will – Session

Thursday, January 21st, 2010

Session number: ?

Average n-back: 7.95

Duration (min.): 25

Reached a new high, 7.95 which was then followed up by a 2nd highest score ever at 7.65. Previous best was at 7.55

I am mildly disappointed to fall short of 8 by such a small margin, but quite happy to continue to improve on BF pro even after many sessions. Evidence that it is possible to raise N levels after a long on and off training period which in my case is now over 1 year.

I am not sure what to attribute this gain to, except that I have started something called super brain yoga about a week back. This is an ancient Eastern technique that has now been marketed to Westerners. I would advise not spending a dime on the book though, given that the exercise is easy to do and a how to can be found online. I do not swear by this or any brain improvement technique but I do try many of them out.

Quick caveat:

Correlation is not causation.

There really are a myriad of other things that may have caused a boost in my N back other than this yoga for the brain — which used to be, and I think still is, a punishment for misbehaving school kids in India.

I would add too that I cannot say that this improvement in dual n back is at all meaningful in any context, other than a gain in N. Still, a gain in N it is.

Brain Fitness Pro working-memory training report.

This post was submitted by Will.

Supplementary Training and 4.0 “Wall”

Monday, October 19th, 2009

I have been compiling a few questions to ask about exercises supplementary to BFP.

First: I wonder if Martin or anyone else has tried out meditation CDs with special sounds on them that are supposed to enhance desired brain wave activity during meditation. Are these better than meditating on own? There’s also the third option of a meditation CD such as Andrew Weil’s, which guides your meditation but doesn’t have special “vibes” in the background, just a voice. Any difference–or am I better off just doing *free* meditation on my own (”free” in both senses, of course). Here is one of the “vibe” CDs that someone recommended to me. I have no idea whether it’s good or not; I haven’t tried it, but here’s the link. Would this (or something like it) make me better at BFP/better in general? http://www.immrama.org/insight/insight.html

Second: Does anyone do “processing speed” exercises along with BFP, and does this make him better at BFP, have synergistic effects with it for cognition in general, and so forth? At present, I use BFP exclusively, which has been good because I have been able to see all that it can do for me (so far!) without being uncertain which of my multiple activities was contributing most to my improvements. After gaining so much from BFP already (after 2.5 months approximately), I wonder whether I should try adding a second exercise to my mix, and the processing speech (e.g. rapid math problems) exercise (or maybe “verbal fluency” exercise?) sound like the most promising supplements though I’m only basing this on intuition and little web reading.

Third and finally: Do people typically get “stuck” around 4.0? I made improvements (small ones) every day almost up till I got close to 4.0. It took me a month to get from 3.90 to 4.05, my current PR. Most recently, a week has past since my 4.05, and the highest I can muster is 3.95, my previous PR. Maybe I have been overtraining? Even if I have been, I have seen major payoffs in my analytic reading ability, which have been *thrilling*, so I’m hardly in a doldrum over all. It’s just that my objective status (as opposed to subjective experience of thinking) hasn’t changed much in the last month.

I know this is a long post. Anyone who wants to respond even only to a small part of it, I welcome his advice!

Working-Memory Training Report – Michelle – Session 34

Sunday, August 16th, 2009

Session number: 34

Average n-back: 5.20

Duration (min.): 60 mins

I’ve been see-sawing backwards and forwards in increments of 10-20 all through the second training group, but my average n-back for today is 5.20. It’s not the first time I’ve reached it, but it’s nice to know that the first time wasn’t a one-off. Various days have been low-focus days, which has ended up back in high 4 averages several times.

I’ve been juggling n-back stuff with brain training at MyBrainTrainer, and with other software. Overall, I’ve been spending at least 2 hours a day on various forms of brain training. In non-n-back training exercises, my focus has been on processing speed, increased focus, and improving visual scanning (obviously to prepare for some of the upcoming more information processing tasks in the WAIS). I think they’ve dovetailed quite nicely.

I finally had a visual-spatial WAIS-III task administered to me 2 days ago (this testing seems to be going at a snail’s pace……). I was kind of looking forward to seeing how I fared in a measure of fluid intelligence, since most of the stuff administered so far has been of the crystallised variety. Either the n-back stuff helped quite a bit, or I’m very good at visual-spatial reasoning (or maybe a bit of either). The only thing that prevented me from a perfect score was anxiety – got nervous ‘butterfingers’ when handling the blocks and lost 1 bonus point on 2 of the questions, and on the final task I kind of panicked then got myself together and focused and finished perfectly – except that the time spent in sheer panic mode meant that I timed out and lost out on points for that question. Apart from that I scored perfectly with everything else. If only dual n-back could do something for the anxiety as well as working memory……..

I think the dual n-back made a difference in that up until the very last couple of questions I didn’t have to refer back to the puzzle as much whilst constructing, because I was able to hold more in my head at once whilst I worked. I think that translated into gaining valuable seconds in a timed task that would have otherwise been taken up moving my eyes backwards and forwards from pattern to construction.

I do think the neuropsychologist was a little bit surprised, as he has had me pegged as high on verbal IQ from day one and kind of naturally expected that visual-spatial would be weaker.

We also went through a visual-spatial memory task from the WMS, and it was way better than the verbal word-pairing I did a few weeks ago. Whilst my visual-spatial memory has always been better than random word groupings anyway, I do wonder whether seeing n-back patterns at n=6 in ever alternating shapes of 3 ‘nodes’ has contributed to that.

Coming up in the next 2 weeks:

That WAIS task that’s like digit span where you have to reorganise the letters and numbers in ascending order (or is it the other way around???). I have a baseline for that from my Simply Smarter software. A couple of weeks into n-back training, my baseline for this particular task was a span of 4. I’ve not taken another baseline since, but in practice exercises I am handling spans of 5, 6, and 7 digits/letters (although at a span of 7 I’m not getting it consistently every time).

Matrix reasoning. I’m curious about this one. I was mad about visual-spatial puzzles about 10 years ago and used to get nearly all of the ones in the Mensa puzzle books right, but immediately prior to n-back training I had slipped a bit (still getting the majority but fluffing a few).

Those ones where you’ve got to cancel out shapes and ones where (I think) you have to copy symbols – the more pure processing ones. It will be interesting to see the effect that a couple of more weeks of dual n-back practice will have on those exercises.

This post was submitted by Michelle.

Success And Perseverance

Monday, August 3rd, 2009

I’m posting a link to this article from the Boston Globe: “The Truth About Grit

The story reports on a growing focus of research into the trait of “grit” and how it relates to success in life.

The story explains how the relationship between IQ and success came to dominate the focus of psychologists, in part because it was easy to test for. Recently, researchers have becom interested in better defining and measuring “grit” in the belief that it may provide a better indicator for success than IQ.

It certainly seems to make a lot of common sense that an intelligent person can fail simply through lack of resolve, and that a less intelligent person can succeed through dint of persistence.

Quite apart from general interest, I have another reason for posting about this story. It also strikes me that dual n-back training can be useful in training both intelligence and persistence or “grit.” It’s certainly not possible to succeed at n-back training without having or developing a fair degree of perseverance!

Working-Memory Training Report – Shaun – Session 157

Monday, July 13th, 2009

Session number: 157

Average n-back: 7.30!

Duration (min.): 30

Reach n=9 once. Done!
Achieve a new personal best. Done!


I quoted the following from Jaeggi (2005, pp. 24-25). I changed the syntax and words slightly to clarify that dual n-back training invokes the following cognitive functions.

+Encoding (interpretation of each stimulus).

+Storage (to retain any stimulus relevant to a future decision).

+Rehearsal (to keep the contents of the storage active).

+Matching (to compare every stimulus against the appropriate previous one, i.e., the one n back in the sequence).

+Temporal ordering (to keep the ordinal position of each stimulus tagged, that the present one can be matched).

+Inhibition (to dampen the trace of the oldest stimulus, replacing it with the newest).

+Response selection (the actual execution of the response.

In short, dual n-back training involves static storage processes and dynamic executive manipulation/updating processes. Every load level requires executive processing, since the allocation of attentional resources to independent stimuli is commonly referred to as core property of the Central Executive System (e.g. Baddeley, 1996).

This post was submitted by Shaun Luttin.

Anything is possible!

Sunday, June 7th, 2009

Session number: 113

Average n-back: 5.0

This has been difficult. The most amazing thing is that if you keep at it you will get better even if you kind of suck at it!

A few obvious points and some observations from my experience and my time investment.

1.) More sessions in a shorter amount of time might not give you any greater improvement.

This makes sense from a neuroplasticity stand point… it takes time for the brain to change in response to the training. However, being impatient i tried over-training as a strategy (113 sessions on 66 training days over a time span of 81 calendar days).

Maybe 66 sessions would have led to the same result?

2.) Not everyone is going to achieve an average n-back of 5 or higher.

It took a large effort for me to achieve 5. My guess is that there are a large number of people who won’t be good at this and will give up early.

Do not give up if at first you feel really lost and hopeless.

3.) Your performance on this test may be out of synch with your expectations based on who you think you are ( various IQ parameters, work, education).

I am considered extremely good at what i do. Like many experts in many different disciplines I work mostly from intuition. My expectation given my education (PhD), experience and success in solving difficult problems would be that i would be good at the n-back training from the start but i was not (at least based on the other posts here).

There must be more to working intelligence than working memory.

My slow but consistent pace of improvement on the n-back test leads me to believe that this training may be helping me improve on a weakness. Thus, I am hopeful that improvement in working memory will help by complimenting what i am already good at…

TO BE CONTINUED:

I plan to continue training.

Next training post if and when i can hit an ave n-back of 5.5

Thanks to all who have posted their experiences here. This has been fun and rewarding. I can feel the difference!

This post was submitted by TravelingWilbury.

Working-Memory Training Report – Shaun – Session 122

Thursday, May 21st, 2009

Session number: 7-8

Average n-back: 6.10

Duration (min.): 40

Hi there BFPro Community:

Goal setting makes life better. By setting manageable, actionable, specific, and time-limited goals we build confidence and motivation. About three weeks ago, I set a goal for myself to complete 19 session of BFPro over a period of five weeks. And as of today I did it. I deserve credit for that, and I could probably do it again if I have to.

Goals are best when they are our behavior because we can control our own behavior far better than we can control our thoughts, feelings, or behavior of others. So I set a goal for myself, and I did it. But, I also asked some questions and made some predictions:

*
**
***
****
*****
******
*******

ULTIMATE GOAL: 19 sessions of BFPro over the next 35 days. More is fine. Done.

RESEARCH QUESTIONS:

a) Will my g improve?
b) By how much?

c) Will my mean n-back improve?
d) By how much?

e) Will my highest n-back block improve?
f) By how much?

PREDICTIONS:

a) My g will improve…
b) … from 810 to 840 on the TRI52!

***This will be determine this weekend. Stay tuned!***

c) My mean n-back will improve…
d) from 6.55 to 6.90!

***Over the last 19 sessions my highest mean n-back for a single session reached 7.20, whereas my highest mean n-back for a single session previously reached 6.55. Thus my mean n-back did improve, and by more than I expected!***

e) My highest block will improve…
f) from n=8 to n=9!

***This did not occur. My highest block remains n=8.***

NULL HYPOTHESES:

I will not reach a TRI52 score of 840.
***Stay tuned***

I will not reach a mean n-back of 6.90.
***False***

I will not reach n=9 for even one block.
***True***

*******
******
*****
****
***
**
*

Here’s how it went today.

n=6, misses=3, I know that blaming makes me feel helpless…
n=6, misses=3, …so what can I do to change the situation…
n=6, misses=3, …and to make myself feel better?
n=6, misses=3, Congratulations Shaun on maintenance.
n=6, misses=2, Congratulations Shaun for persistence.
n=7, misses=4, Congratulstions Shaun for maintenance.
n=7, misses=3, Congratulastions Shaun for the effort!
n=7, misses=3, Congratulations Shaun for the quiescence.
n=7, misses=3, Congratulastions Shaun for concentration.
n=7, misses=4, Congratulastion Shaun for the effort!
n=7, misses=4, Yeah, this is frustrating…
n=7, misses=6, …but it’s not the end of the world…
n=6, misses=4, So what if I don’t get what I want…
n=6, misses=3, …it’s not the end of the world…
n=6, misses=8, …and not a reason to blow up…
n=5, misses=4, Why am I swearing?
n=5, misses=3, I feel frustrated, and things aren’t going…
n=5, misses=4, …the way I would like, but I can cope…
n=5, misses=4, …with the situation…
n=5, misses=5, I want to be accurate.
Mean=6.1, How often has this really happened?

This post was submitted by Shaun Luttin.